Fifth Site Manager in Four Years appointed by Camphill Village Trust at Botton Village Tuesday 19 May 2015 PDF Print Last Wednesday CVT announced to members the appointment of not one, but two, further ‘temporary’ managers at Botton Village. Sadly, once again, neither of these managers comes with any experience in Camphill or the running of intentional communities, an issue which has dogged all of their predecessors and caused a range of problems within CVT’s communities including Botton. The issues arising from management inexperience are multiple and diverse, and, for example have included the bizarre incident in the last few weeks when a support worker at Botton spent charity money on buying frozen, pre-prepared, sliced carrots for the residents’ lunch at one of the farms where they actually grow large quantities of organic carrots, (bewildered residents were quite hurt that their efforts seemed to be so undervalued). In addition, residents are being distressed by many management actions as their choices and wishes are systematically belittled in contravention of the community’s ethos and good social care practice, under which all members of the community are afforded choice and should be involved in decisions. There was no consultation with any community members before these managers were appointed, just as - even more critically - learning disabled residents have had no say in the appointment of new support workers who then come to support them in their homes! The managers come as a team and include Caroline Tomlinson, Co-founder of charity ‘In Control’, whose incomplete report on CVT’s communities in 2012 was rejected by the families but accepted and endorsed as setting their future direction by the CVT Trustees. This endorsement was not withstanding the fact that no analysis had been provided of both the financial impact of their recommendations, or of their compliance with the Charity’s memorandum - so it was not known if this fiscally viable, nor if this in fact complied with the founding articles and ethos of the Charity at the time it was accepted. Caroline joins in a part time role to support temporary manager Wayne Mason. Wayne Mason comes from a military background via Community Integrated Care. Neil Davidson, Chair of Action for Botton, said: “We would hope that this is a real chance for a new start as CVT seems to have appointed managers with actual experience in learning disability rather than drug rehabilitation or the prison system, if only there could have been some involvement of the community in the appointments it would have been a real sign that CVT intends to work with the community. We know that they will be warmly and courteously welcomed. Each manager appointed has always been treated with respect and met with the wish to work with them. It would have also been better if they came with previous experience of intentional communities. We can only hope that they will take up the invitations that other non-CVT Camphill communities have extended to them to visit, in order to gain some understanding of how intentional communities should be run". A Botton Co-worker, who wishes to remain anonymous for fear of reprisals, says: “It is demeaning for those learning disabled Villagers working hard on the land growing top quality organic vegetables to be served pre-packed, non-organic carrots and shows that the hourly paid support workers are not being properly briefed by CVT managers. He continues “Let’s hope that Mr Mason’s conduct is better than that of predecessors. The present manager David Knowles was reported to the Police for harassing residents and intrusively photographing vulnerable people (and has been “off-sick” for three months since inappropriate pictures were spotted on his Twitter account) whilst his predecessor Mark Horton left in 2012 after formal criticism from Kent County Council for the incorrect removal of one House-mother, from Skylark House at Botton. The Local Authority investigation found that the residents ‘needs were not fully taken into account when changes were made at Skylark House and this had a far reaching effect on health and well being’ ”. Campaigners claim that over the last four years CVT have been moving all their sites away from the traditional, Camphill community model, converting the communities into sterile institutions devoid of emotional, spiritual and psychological fulfillment. The sites now appear to be staffed mostly by low-paid, gagged, shift-workers who live away from the learning disabled, commute in to work and have little or no commitment to or involvement with the community. Campaigners say the events of last week only serve to highlight their claims that the new management structure being imposed is inappropriate for running an intentional community that it is at odds with the original objectives of the Charity. These were to support and promote a healthy, vibrant community, including children and pensioners, and where everything revolves around family life with people of all abilities forming caring families, each person contributing and working such as their abilities allow and each being supported by the community according to their needs (see notes for full detail). The legitimate Co-worker model community is locked in a legal battle to wrest back control of the communities they founded from the Trust’s management who, they claim, have in effect undertaken a hostile takeover. Overwhelming support for the campaign has been flooding in from the international Camphill movement whilst political support for the Community’s struggle against the enforced changes is growing with concern for the situation expressed by Baroness Hollins in the House of Lords this spring, over 30 MPs of all political colours writing to Ministers to express their concern, an Early Day Motion raised in Parliament about Botton, and the Minister for Disabled People, Mark Harper MP, holding an enquiry at another CVT site, The Grange, in his constituency. CVT was already under scrutiny in multiple areas with campaigners highlighting serious questions about the way the charity is run including a worrying lack of transparency in its accounts which, in spite of requests, has yet to be clarified; a potential conflict of interest with a director whose own company supplies services to CVT for unidentified remuneration; claims of harassment being made to local Police and pending actions for compensation by former community members who claim to have been bullied out of their roles and communities. In addition, in February there was a sudden Trustee resignation citing assorted governance issues including concerns relating to the Articles and Memorandum. Finally, legal mediation is expected to be taking place in about 4 weeks’ time relating to the High Court claim brought by campaigners, including parents from one community now devoid of Co-workers, over alleged breaches of the charity’s articles resulting in an end to the shared-living model of care. While campaigners prepare to present their case to the High Court, the residents have looked to Unite to help them protect their way of life. Some 70 Co-workers and residents have formed a branch of the Unite Community and are organising alongside other Unite activists to raise the profile of their struggle and to organise effectively against the changes. One can only wonder how CVT’s Chair of Trustees Felicity Chadwick-Histed, also a Partner at Publitas Consulting LLP can continue to ignore the plight of the learning disabled for whom the Trustees are ultimately responsible. Notes to Editors Betrayal of Trust - CVT is a Trust that was originally set up to hold and manage assets which belong to an intentional community and are held in a state of Trust specifically to be administered for the benefit of the charity’s beneficiaries. - To put it simply, the set-up is comparable to the way that parents might leave monies ‘in Trust’ for their children and have trustees administer the funds specifically for the benefit of those children. - The trustees have a duty of care to make sure that any money is used in the way the Trust says and the trustees must make sure this happens. - The Camphill community at Botton consists of both learning disabled residents and the Co-worker families who together create the community. The community includes people of all ages from children to pensioners. - The trustees are given very clear instructions as to how the community should be run particularly about shared living and the support being given freely and not brought in exclusively by employees. Until recently, the community managed its own affairs and choices internally. - Instead of holding the assets and administering the finances as they are supposed to, the trust appears to have secretly decided to try to get rid of the volunteers and stop shared living. Effectively it therefore attacked its beneficiary (the community) and is currently trying to evict community members from the site when it should be supporting them. - This is the equivalent of those trustees of a child’s Trust ignoring what the parents wanted. - Senior barristers, including Queens Counsel, now say that the actions of CVT mean that the Trustees are in breach of trust and acting outside their authority. - The trustees appear oblivious to their potential liability as they may be personally liable for the conduct of the Trust. They are called "Trustees" because they are trusted to behave properly. CVT Trustees who are responsible for the conduct of the Trust Christopher John Beckett Retired Stephen Stanley Butterworth Consultant on public to private sector transfers Felicity Anne Chadwick-Histed Partner in Publitas Christopher Cook Retired architect Diana Mary Parrish Part-time educational consultant Peter Sveinbjarnarson Chairman of Sólheimar community in Iceland Robert James Thompson Director of consultancy - specialising in service reconfiguration Karen Elizabeth Walker Educational adviser Interviewees Please contact the press office if you would like an interview with any of a wide range of stakeholders including; Campaigners from Action for Botton including the chair Co-workers and former Co-workers Legal experts Accounting experts Parents and family members of the residents Learning disabled residents CVTs False Claims to the Press Recently CVT has been making a number of false and misleading claims to members of the press, we should like to set the record straight; Misleading Claims re HMRC and Tax False claims about HMRC's position on Tax. CVT has taken actions which they must have known would convert Co-workers into employees and has made false claims in order to do this, initially claiming that it was necessary to do this due to changes in tax law, which they now agree is untrue. Furthermore CVT could easily support and facilitate the Co-worker tax model if it chose to - something HMRC has made completely clear in correspondence; 1. In short, there is a technical document which sets out how to determine a vocational co-worker’s income which is then subject to taxation, which can be viewed on the HMRC website (BIM22040). This is still valid as confirmed by the Treasury and HMRC in writing only a few months ago. 2. Many other Camphill communities in the UK, outside CVT, operate the normal vocational Co-worker model, where the community clearly is allowed to continue to exist, perfectly satisfactorily in line with this taxation document. 3. CVT, however, knowingly undermined the existence of community by enforcing changes that it did not have to make - this was its choice and strategy and by ceasing to recognise the communities as separate from the charity and Co-workers as living and working within the community, it has imposed layers of intensive management thereby changing the facts on the ground. i.e. it is CVT’s choice to try and force employment on the Co-workers. 4. CVT stated it wished to employ all Co-workers from 6th April. It produced information which failed to acknowledge the existence of a community and regarded vocational Co-workers as “engaged” as employees. The vocational co-worker should not (according to the charity’s constitution) have any contractual relationship with the charity or indeed the community in which they live and work. HMRC's website states that "Co-workers assist the vulnerable members within each community, living together in houses, sharing money and making joint decisions.” 5. Co-workers are categorically not engaged in tax avoidance. (BIM 22040 deals with their liability to pay tax). A detailed breakdown plus supporting documentation of these can be viewed on the Action for Botton website on the following link: http://www.actionforbotton.org/cvt-misinformation-corrected Claims about Shared living CVT has never mentioned until recently to Co-workers, residents or their families that the offered traditional Camphill shared life model is an option going forward. On the contrary managers and trustees have always stated to all stakeholders and the press that this would never be possible for employees, whether former Co-workers or otherwise - they would not be allowed to live in the same households as the learning disabled as a matter of statute; this was emphasised strongly in their correspondence. After the unsuccessful mediated dialogue last December, the CVT CEO did say that he would set up a workshop to explore the possibilities for shared living and invite guidance from an outside group (“Shared Lives”), however, even though he suggested a date for this of Feb 10th the meeting was never held. We are therefore extremely surprised that in recent press statements a ‘spokesperson’ for CVT claimed this was a possibility, however we have no evidence that this claim is true. Residents being upset Claims made by CVT regarding the learning disabled being upset are misleading, they are upset precisely because of CVT's actions for three reasons: 1. firstly because they are not being listened to, their clearly stated opinions are being ignored and 2. secondly because CVT has made reported and very underhanded attempts to gag them and prevent them speaking about their objections to the changes. These attempts include failure to acknowledge their capacity under the mental Capacity Act and banning the press from coming into the homes of the residents when they have been invited by residents and where the residents are lawful tenants. This is a breach of their right to free speech: they are entitled to speak about things they object to and find upsetting. 3. the learning disabled residents know that CVT plans to segregate them from their Co-worker families. The cause of their upset is in fact CVT’s actions and Action for Botton has facilitated the learning disabled being heard by the media which they have found very empowering and are deeply grateful that someone at last wants to help them. CVT are being disingenuous in accusing Co-workers of spreading misinformation amongst villagers; please see an analysis that shows how it is in fact CVT that subtly but systematically misleads the most vulnerable in their care. We urge readers to read this example of CVT's deception campaign in the following link and consider how this contrasts with CVT's mantra of 'the beneficiaries at the heart of all we do'. http://bit.ly/1BdxrD3 Laws, etc, campaigners say CVT have breached Human Rights Act Mental Capacity Act Harassment Act Companies Act Charity Commission regulations The Charity’s own Memorandum and Articles of Association Links to additional information Example of support messages for the campaign and communications; Families writing to Camphill Village Trust and to North Yorkshire County Council many more letters from families and friends of Botton to CVT Recent Coverage can be viewed here http://www.actionforbotton.org/Publications/newspaper-articl... http://www.actionforbotton.org/Publications/audio-and-video Independent report that outlines the devastating effects of these changes on other CVT communities. The unintentional destruction of intentional communities by Bob Rhodes and Richard Davis, published in March 2014. It is available at; http://www.centreforwelfarereform.org/library/by-az/regulati... How bureaucrats destroy public services http://tinyurl.com/k56k37p Guidelines about care of the learning disabled can be viewed here http://tinyurl.com/kmj54e6 or https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachm... About Camphill Botton Village The Camphill Movement was started over seventy years ago by German/Austrian Jews fleeing from the Nazis at a time of great persecution of the disabled. They did this to give learning disabled adults the chance 1. to live closely with the land and in a beneficial environment, 2. to live in a community where all are equal, irrespective of their abilities 3. to have a meaningful and fulfilling working life CVT was founded in October 1954 to support the first adult community of Botton Village, which was started by Villagers, their families and volunteer Co-workers as an ‘intentional community' in 1955. The Articles of Incorporation expressly specify that the charity's purpose is to establish a community into which the disabled can be incorporated in order that their lives be fulfilled according to the above principles. http://www.actionforbotton.org/files/CVT_Mem__Arts_highlight... The community was therefore formed to include and support people with a wide range of disabilities. Those with learning disabilities live with the volunteer (unwaged) Co-worker families in shared family-like households so that they can each be supported to participate in all aspects of community life including fulfilling and meaningful work. http://www.actionforbotton.org/Botton-Village/living-togethe... Fundamental to the movement is sustainable farming, and as a result CVT has grown to be the single largest holder of bio-dynamically farmed land in the UK with Botton in particular winning awards. http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/local-news/honour-for-bott... The entire community shares all the work in running the sustainable community, according to their abilities and wishes and for the benefit of all. Everyone agrees to these principles when they join the village. The result of this has set a world-leading standard in terms of community living, with Botton village famously leading the way in sustainability. The community has been based for the last sixty years on vocational volunteer Co-workers receiving no salary, living modestly, pooling resources, having their needs met by the community. http://www.actionforbotton.org/files/Three_Perspectives.pdf Since its foundation, the Village has been widely recognised as an exemplar of a sustainable, inclusive community and has been much copied, inspiring over a hundred communities of the Camphill movement world-wide - 75 separate Camphill Communities worldwide and 36 in the British Isles, nine of which are currently CVT communities that grew out of the original site at Botton. Popular for its caring and inclusive values, Botton Village has attracted generous donations and support from the public over the years with supporters keen to make sure that this unique way of life is continued. The original property owned by the charity was offered by the Macmillan (publishing) family, and/or built, bought and/or renovated with the help of donations intended for the purpose of supporting the remarkable community that is the Botton that donors know, admire and are keen to support. Four years ago the appointment of a new management team at CVT heralded a catastrophic departure from Botton's founding structure and values, with management making repeated attempts to undermine the ethos and core caring principles of Camphill and ignoring the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the charity. Links to more details on this are below; http://www.actionforbotton.org/Hijacking-a-charity http://www.actionforbotton.org/files/Summary_of_alleged_abus... About Action for Botton Pressure group Action for Botton has been set-up by stakeholders including friends, families, former Co-workers and Co-workers to oppose these changes and enjoys the support of 84 Botton parents and family members, the majority of the 95 learning disabled residents at Botton as well as over 5,000 supporters locally and worldwide. In December 2014 representatives of the group entered into mediation talks with Camphill Village Trust in a bid to find common ground over the planned changes. Despite several deadline extensions, reassurances from CVT about halting the changes whilst talks were in progress were not forthcoming and the talks did not progress and since then Action for Botton - along with other Camphill communities at Delrow (near Watford) and the Grange (Newnham-on-Severn) have vowed that they will continue their campaign. Tellingly, CVT refused to call these talks ‘mediation’ at the time, but are now using that term for PR purposes. For further information see www.actionforbotton.org and http://www.actionforbotton.org/files/Camphill_Values_v2.2_sh... Contact Information Botton Buddies See www.bottonbuddies.org Action for Botton Neil Davidson – Chair Email: firstname.lastname@example.org Press National Kay Clark Tel: 0845 833 8292 Email: email@example.com Regional Richard Graham Tel: 01765 640736 Email: firstname.lastname@example.org This press release was distributed by ResponseSource Press Release Wire on behalf of Action for Botton in the following categories: Health, Environment & Nature, Education & Human Resources, Farming & Animals, Public Sector, Third Sector & Legal, for more information visit http://pressreleasewire.responsesource.com/about.